NetNut Seized by the FBI: What Proxy Buyers Should Do Now
The residential proxy market changed more in 2026 than in years: Google disrupted IPIDEA in January, and on 2 July NetNut was seized by the FBI. This is the updated picture for buyers, built only from what KrebsOnSecurity, The Register and Infosecurity Magazine reported, followed by the checks to run on your own provider.
PA
ProxyAdvice Editorial Team, Proxy Research Desk
ProxyAdvice · Provider comparisons from published pricing and docs
✓ Sources checkedNovember 2, 2026
🤖 Direct answer
On 2 July 2026, the FBI, with IRS Criminal Investigation, seized hundreds of domains tied to NetNut, a residential proxy service run by Alarum Technologies, KrebsOnSecurity reported. Google said NetNut’s network spanned at least 2 million devices. If you buy residential proxies, check whether your provider resells NetNut capacity, re-test the countries you depend on, and keep a backup provider.
⚡ TL;DR · skip here if you are in a hurry
What happened: the FBI seized hundreds of NetNut domains on 2 July 2026, working with Google, Lumen and Shadowserver, according to KrebsOnSecurity and Infosecurity Magazine.
Why buyers should care: Google said with high confidence that many popular residential proxy brands white-label NetNut’s network, so the impact may reach beyond NetNut’s own customers.
What to do: ask your provider where its IPs come from, re-test every country and city you rely on, and keep a second provider ready.
NetNut seized by the FBI: what happened?
Here’s a mistake that’s easy to make: buying residential proxies from a brand you trust without asking where its IPs come from. NetNut’s seizure shows why that question now matters.
On 2 July 2026, the FBI said it had worked with industry partners to seize hundreds of domains associated with NetNut, KrebsOnSecurity reported. The NetNut homepage was replaced with an FBI seizure banner that also named the IRS Criminal Investigation division. In a 8 July update, Krebs reported that alarum.io, the site of parent company Alarum Technologies, also showed a seizure notice.
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group disabled Google accounts and services NetNut used for malware command and control, and Google Play Protect began warning Android users about apps with NetNut’s code, Infosecurity Magazine reported. Lumen and the Shadowserver Foundation also took part.
Domains seized
Hundreds
Devices, per Google
2M+
Threat clusters in one week
316
Alarum share drop in a week
About 67%
Who confirmed it, and what did they say?
Three outlets and two companies are on the record, and they agree on the core facts.
The Register reported on 3 July that NetNut had at least 2 million enrolled devices, mainly small TV-streaming hardware, and that Google expects wider effects on the residential proxy market. Infosecurity Magazine reported that NetNut’s code was embedded in cheap, off-brand Android TVs, streaming boxes and unofficial apps such as SmartTube, which quietly rented out home connections as proxy exit nodes.
Krebs reported that Alarum’s stock traded at $2.62 on 8 July, down about 67% in a week. The Register noted on 3 July that netnut.com showed the seizure page while netnut.io was still online, and Infosecurity Magazine reported that experts said both domains belonged to the same operation.
Could your provider be affected if you never bought NetNut?
Possibly, because NetNut sold its network to other brands as well as to its own customers.
Infosecurity Magazine reported that Google assessed with high confidence that many popular residential proxy brands white-label (resell under their own name) NetNut’s network. The Register reported that NetNut ran a reseller program, and that after IPIDEA’s disruption, proxy operators began buying capacity from competitors. None of the three sources names the brands involved.
No brand list has been published
The sources don’t say which providers resell NetNut capacity. Ask your own provider directly, in writing, and keep the answer on file.
What should proxy buyers do now?
The practical risk for a buyer is losing coverage in the exact countries and cities your work depends on.
Ask where the IPs come fromEmail your provider and ask whether any of its residential pool is resold from another network, and how device owners give consent.
List your locationsWrite down every country, city or region you target. A pool can look large overall and still be thin in one market.
Re-test each regionRun a small test per location, for example the US, an EU country, an Asian market and a MENA country, and compare success and speed.
Check city accuracyFor city targeting, confirm that the exit IPs actually geolocate to the city you ordered, not just the country.
Keep a backup providerHold a small balance with a second provider, ideally one whose traffic doesn’t expire, so a sudden outage doesn’t stop the work.
The Register advises refusing offers that pay you to run a proxy SDK. If you own an off-brand streaming box or use unofficial TV apps, Infosecurity Magazine’s reporting suggests checking what’s installed.
What isn’t known yet?
Several points that matter to buyers aren’t answered by the three sources.
Which proxy brands resold NetNut capacity. Google said many did but named none in the coverage.
Whether NetNut’s service will return, and when. The sources describe the seizure, not a restart.
What happens to existing NetNut customers’ balances. KrebsOnSecurity said its article doesn’t describe this.
How each region was affected. None of the reports breaks the device count down by country.
Yes. KrebsOnSecurity reported that on 2 July 2026 the FBI said it had worked with industry partners to seize hundreds of domains associated with NetNut. The NetNut homepage showed an FBI seizure banner that also named IRS Criminal Investigation. Infosecurity Magazine and The Register reported the same action, with Google, Lumen and the Shadowserver Foundation involved.
KrebsOnSecurity described Popa as a collection of at least two million devices compromised by malicious software, which security firms linked to NetNut’s residential proxy network. Infosecurity Magazine reported that researchers track NetNut as the Popa botnet, and that its code ran on cheap Android TVs, streaming boxes and unofficial apps.
NetNut is operated by Alarum Technologies, a publicly traded Israeli company listed on NASDAQ under ALAR, according to KrebsOnSecurity. Alarum said it takes the matter seriously and will fully cooperate with law enforcement. Krebs reported that Alarum’s share price fell about 67% in the week after the seizure, to $2.62 on 8 July.
It may be, even if you never bought from NetNut directly. Infosecurity Magazine reported that Google assessed with high confidence that many popular residential proxy brands white-label NetNut’s network. None of the sources names those brands, so ask your provider in writing whether any of its pool is resold from another network.
Move critical work to another provider, list every country and city you target, and re-test each region before you switch fully. Keep a small backup balance with a second provider. The sources read don’t describe what happens to existing NetNut balances, so contact the company in writing about any unused credit.
The Register advises refusing offers that pay you to run a proxy SDK. Infosecurity Magazine reported that NetNut’s code was hidden in off-brand Android TVs, streaming boxes and unofficial apps such as SmartTube. Remove apps you don’t trust, keep devices updated, and keep Google Play Protect switched on, which Google used to warn users.
🔎
How we put this together
Last verified: November 2, 2026 · ProxyAdvice · affiliate links marked ↗ may earn a commission
This report uses only three sources, read on October 29, 2026: KrebsOnSecurity’s article of 2 July 2026 with its 8 July update, The Register’s article of 3 July 2026, and Infosecurity Magazine’s article of 3 July 2026. Every fact is attributed to one of them. We added no claims of our own about motives or outcomes. For provider reputation, compare independent proxy ratings on ProxyRates.